REVIEW: Faefever

2008 September 24
by kmont

Karen Marie Moning
Faefever (Fever #3)
Delacorte Press
ISBN-13: 978-0385341639
Dark/urban fantasy
September 16, 2008

Yeah, spoilers.…

I’ve been pimping this book here on la blog for several months. Excitement has bubbled and roiled over from the previous two, Darkfever and Bloodfever, and reached a fever pitch (sorry, too easy to resist) around here a long time ago. I want to emphasize that that excitement has come purely from the books, not from my imagination; I’m not in the habit of revving my own perception up to the point that I’m unrealistic about expectations. That being said, my expectations were sorely unmet in this third Fever book by Moning.

For those not familiar with the series, a recap: MacKayla Lane is a genuine Southern bell, or so she seems, being raised in Georgia. Pretty clothes, parties and boys are all she thinks about…until the death of her sister. Alina was studying abroad in Dublin, and when she’s killed, nothing is ever the same for Mac again. Unsatisfied with the lack of commitment from the Garda, the Irish police, Mac goes to Dublin against her parents’ wishes to solve the mystery herself. There she uncovers just enough to know that Alina’s murder is anything but normal in terms of how and why she died. Something else is alive in the rich and old city of Dublin, something we’ve only ever dreamed about as children…things that don’t belong in our world but want it anyway.

There she meets Jericho Barrons, a reclusive and infuriating bookshop owner who aids Mac in discovering who and what she and Alina are – sidhe seers, women who can sense and see the fae. But who exactly – and what – is Jericho Barrons? What is his stake in what is quickly becoming a race to save the world from the evil fae, the Unseelie? And can she trust the Seelie prince, V’Lane, who’s insinuated himself into her life too? Most importantly, can she trust either man? Mac can detect ancient fae relics and it’s this talent that makes her indispensable in finding a special book, the Sinsar Dubh, that many want and are willing to kill for. As the walls between the mortals and fae grow thinner, Mac is running out of time to find Alina’s killer and to stop the Unseelie from unleashing a reign of terror.

I really love this series. It’s got a tour de force heroine in Mac, one I’m very happy to have watched grow and strengthen throughout the last two books. At first she seems like a typical, carefree girl, intent on going about a very normal and, well, average life. As the books progress, she becomes just dark enough and yet still positive enough that there’s a sense of balance in her when the rest of the world is going to hell. In essence, she is the beacon when all else is going wrong. I think she has truly come to represent the hope that I’ve come to have while reading these books; that no matter how ugly it may still get, there will be something that happens that redeems those darker reading hours. And Mac will be its deliverance.

Too, I’ve always loved Moning’s worldbuilding. She took the lighter, almost benign aspects of her fae lore in her highlander romance series and took it up several notches for the dark fantasy Fever books. Where it was almost sweet and definitely romantic before, now Moning’s fae details are downright chilling and scary. I’ve always applauded her for going in a different direction, especially when it’s paid off so well. No longer the toned down version we used to read, these fae are out for blood, human blood. They’re hunters of sidhe seers, possessors of human bodies, eaters of physical beauty and bringers of strife and pain. They know nothing of human emotions and in fact are so alien as to step completely out of our realm of logic, laws and ethics.

Faefever presents a little bit of new information, but honestly not much else. If you’re familiar wit the first two books, scenes in Fefever will read and feel very similar. Too similar. As in repetitive. Mac’s still carrying around her flashlights and the Spear of Destiny, a Seelie Hollow, everywhere she goes (although she does invent a new light infused weapon in a scene that was one of the only truly illuminating in the book). The shades, and her large, almost nemesis one that perks up at seeing her every time, are still pressing as close to the back of the bookshop as they can…waiting. Rowena, head of the sidhe-seers, is still a raging bitch but some of her minions do come out of the closet long enough to engage Mac and later form a tentative truce. V’Lane is actually, surprisingly, helpful in a few parts of the book. Barrons is off doing his usual mysterious whatever, although there are a few interactions between him and Mac, but nothing we haven’t really seen before. It’s the usual smart alec comment exchange (which I actually like and would miss should it stop) and occasional show of force on Barrons’ part to scare some sense into Mac and to “help” her prepare for all the evil to come. I admit I’m getting a bit tired of him sicking himself on Mac like a rabid attack dog, but it seems it’s his fae boot camp specialty. And too, of course, he is not forthcoming at all with Mac and shares no information with her. Mac is as in the dark as ever when it comes to Barrons, but this time it really costs her. And I kept wondering why nothing really happens in this book to advance the character development or plot.

The author includes a note opposite the last page of the book, where we’re left with probably the worst cliffhanger I’ve ever had the displeasure of reading. Warning, this is a huge spoiler, but I have to address it. Mac is raped by three, and then a fourth, Unseelie “prince”. Moning claims that she “foreshadowed this moment” and what we’ll read later. Um, yeah, caught that – thanks. It however doesn’t make the ending any less frustrating or the book as a whole less disappointing. I also know that some readers and Moning herself feel this absolutely had to happen to Mac in order for the story to progress as it needed to. Since we’re still not clued into any concrete whys in the series, I honestly DO know that it’s possible I will “understand” why it is so essential to have a character raped, I firmly disagree with the logic used behind it sometimes. Yes, rape is a reality, and I certainly haven’t ever had to stand in those shoes – but I don’t think a person has to to be able to address it either. I find it nauseating  that it is sometimes purported to be this great, character-building plot device, that it will make the character/victim a stronger person, that she/he will learn from it and come out better for it in the end. I have no doubt either that this couldn’t be the case, but I simply get sick when I see it approved of in this fashion for the sake of character growth or plot development. In Mac’s case, she was always this strong person that managed to resist attempts to turn her Pri-ya (addicted to fae sex). And then, after all she’s struggled with and what it did to her sister, I am sorely disappointed that it was used on Mac. And just sad to see it used in the manner it is at the very.damn.end.of.the.book.

In closing on that sore subject, the part in the book where it’s foreshadowed (a scene with Barrons in which she all but accuses him of rape) was very obvious and just did not jive with the rest of the story. It stuck out like a sore thumb and I’m really surprised because I’ve never before felt Moning deliberately manipulated the story as opposed to letting it all flow naturally.

I’ve been reading other reviews and run across a few that have felt this book would’ve made more sense tacked onto Bloodfever or Dreamfever, the upcoming fourth book. I have to say I agree. What we have in Faefever is a bit more information. There is absolutely no plot advancement or movement till the last chapter and even then only in it’s last three to four pages. At under 20 chapters (19 to be exact), I knew I’d be getting a short, quick read, but I truly expected (and I think readers deserved) to see more than just a little more information on the fae. Now, what we did get I liked and have no doubt it will make more sense in the next book…or maybe not till the last one. I firmly feel though that in order to justify this book as part of the series it needed to be able to stand somewhat on it’s own, at least through closure of some details that we’ve been rehashing over and over. That did not happen though, the closure, on any level and the book leaves off with a big WTF and absolutely no satisfaction terms of overall development.

I am a fan of this series. I get it. And I am unhappy with this recent installment. It doesn’t mean, however, that I have no business going on with the series and I will be doing so. I have to decide though if the next will be worth the wait, or if it will be better to get and read it when the fifth and final installment is available as well. Considering the obvious lack in this one, it feels like the best solution. For those wondering if they want to read Faefever now or wait, I can only say I wished I had waited till Dreamfever was released. Faefever feels very much like a new prologue in what is clearly meant to be the big second half of the series. But who wants just the prologue?

Rating: Two and a half scoops

26 Responses leave one →
  1. 2008 September 24

    Oh gosh. You just put me off this entire series. Oh well.

  2. 2008 September 24
    kmont permalink

    Oops, lol. Well, if you should ever want to try it, go for it – you never know what might work for you that didn’t for me. I had just SO hoped to finally start getting some answers in this series.

    At least we know it ends with five books and won’t spin off into infinity.

  3. 2008 September 24
    flower permalink

    KMont: “….some readers and Moning herself feel this absolutely had to happen to Mac in order for the story to progress as it needed to…..”

    Flower: WTH??!!!!!

    KMont: “…..Since we’re still not clued into any concrete whys in the series, I honestly DO know that it’s possible I will “understand” why it is so essential to have a character raped, I firmly disagree with the logic used behind it sometimes….”

    Flower: As do I!!!

    KMont: “….I find it nauseating that it is sometimes purported to be this great, character-building plot device, that it will make the character/victim a stronger person, that she/he will learn from it and come out better for it in the end….”

    Flower: Oh dear friend of mine…you have so clearly touched a nerve…*sheepish grin*…and you know that I must comment!!
    For many of you who are members of the Disucussion Board, you are aware that my own daughter was raped nearly 2 years ago. Rape, we can all acknowledge, is an ugly and vicious crime.
    But what many, including some authors and fans don’t realize, is that while it may appear that one comes out stronger and more fully developed through such a trial….this is just an illusion.
    You come out harder, more able to defend yourself….less inclined to be kind in the face of meanness. But this strength is brittle and robs the victim of an essential part of themselves.
    I have no doubt that should the same happen to my girl again, she would be lost to us forever. I do doubt that this would be the case if it had been any other crime.
    Victims of rape?….They are never the same. and there are many other things (ie plot devices) that can promote character growth without this loss of an essential part of self.

    KMont: “….I have no doubt either that this couldn’t be the case, but I simply get sick when I see it approved of in this fashion for the sake of character growth or plot development…..”

    Flower: WORD….and thanks for the heads up….*dammitall*…I really liked Monings work to this point. Another one bites the dust in my TBR wish pile.

  4. 2008 September 24
    Leslie permalink

    ((((flower))))

    The more I read about this book the less likely I think I will read it at all. I really like Mac and the whole thing just turns me off this book. If I do read it maybe I’ll just stop before getting to the end.

    I completely agree with flower that there are other ways to promote character growth. Just wish KMM had used one of them. : (

    Thanks for the review KMont. I can’t imagine it was an easy review to write.

  5. 2008 September 24

    Hmmm, I have the first book but haven’t read it, and not sure I want to read the series now.

    The last book I read with a rape scene was Iron Kissed by Patricia Briggs. Now I do think that was organic to the plot line. It had little to do with the heroine and more to do with the character of the rapist, a man who was only able to feel happy about himself when he exercised power over others.

    I blogged about the New Sleeping Beauty syndrome a while ago. It’s a side of UF that I don’t particularly like. The fact that before a heroine can come fully into her power she has to be beaten/raped/murdered/assaulted. It doesn’t happen in every UF book, but I think it happens in a significant amount.

  6. 2008 September 24
    kmont permalink

    Rape is very much a subject you’ll see a wide variety of reactions from. Flower, I know your story, so I definitely understand your view.

    I already know the term that Moning herself would call me: the PC-police. It came from her message board, in a special section for Faefever discussion. If you have access it’s found here:

    http://www.karenmoning.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10973

    And this is the part that tells me I would be considered a fan that “doesn’t get it”. Her definition for PC-police:

    “…who so often get up in arms about rape and/or forced seduction–regardless of its merit or context within the arc and purpose of the story…”

    So, by using the acronym P.C. in the book (used a few times by Barrons), it seems to be a dig at those she knew would have complaints about the rape scene.

    I know that authors are people too and feel the need to defend their work, but I paid for this book and to now see that she is meaning P.C. in this way is pretty tacky. If any author is aware that what they write could possibly disturb readers, why choose to make a dig at them? Is taunting really the way to go?

    And then, I could be interpreting this entirely wrong, but when she defines it in that manner, I don’t see how I could be.

  7. 2008 September 24
    flower permalink

    If we are going to be the so called “PC Police”….I want a badge. *snickers*

    I have to agree that it appears she is taunting those who find this particular plot device unnecessary…which is a sad state of affairs, if that is truly her pov. I find that anyone who could gain from this type of experience, or not realize the depth of horror that it engenders for some (without at least appreciating their pov)…is the one who “doesn’t get it”.

  8. 2008 September 24
    kmont permalink

    A badge sounds nice and official lol.

    Here’s another thing: If Moning really felt the need to write that scene (and I know she did, I’ve read her board), then fine….I just could go bald trying to figure out why it needed to be left at that exact spot. That alone is just asking for people to get a bit WTF. I am willing to see where she goes with this, despite my initial and still present discomfort with it though.

    Moning mentions on her board too that this is the way the story is, and that she can’t make everyone happy – which I think is a very healthy point for an author to stand on. But that made the P.C. term and her meaning of it all the more confusing. On one hand, there’s the realization that not everyone will be happy w/the story and that’s OK, but on the other there’s a reference to people like me that might have a problem with the way this rape scene was done?

    Color me baffled.

    And a general thing to all those that have read this review and felt they are turned off the series now: If the review helped you I am glad, but it’s not my intention to keep this book from being read either. My perception is only one out of thousands or more reading this book. I still love the series, I just feel wounded as a reader by it now, wary so-to-speak. And this is a concept that, dare I say, some might not “get”. Mac is a character I’d grown to love. It’s always been hard for me to accept when something of this magnitude happens to a character I’ve come to anticipate so much. So, my reaction to the rape scene is a genuine form of…well, grief for her. We shall see where it goes from there in Dreamfever. I’d hate with a passion to not finish this series.

    So thanks, Leslie, because yes, this was a hard review to write. Moning is one of my all-time favorite writers, so it’s very hard to find criticism with her work.

    And for LesleyW, I’d not heard of the Sleeping Beauty syndrome. I need to read your blog on it – thanks!

  9. 2008 September 24

    I’ve only gotten as far as Darkfever. Mac never really pulled me in. She was a bit too superficial for my tastes. I did hear that she gets better as the books progress, but I’m not interested enough to keep going, especially after reading this review.

  10. 2008 September 24
    kmont permalink

    Brie, I know Mac’s superficiality has been a blockade for others too, so you’re definitely not alone there. ANd I felt she was too, but am happy with how far she’s come in terms of development. Now, in Faefever, I feel she has some setbacks, but….well I guess it’s till Dreamfever to see if almost anything in Faefever made a lick of sense.

  11. 2008 September 24
    Hilcia permalink

    I’ve read the book and am in total agreement with your review. I also couldn’t wait for this book and am more than disappointed. Never thought I would use the word “wallbanger” to describe a KMM or one of the Fever books, but this was definitely a “wallbanger” for me.
    Being that this is the 3rd book in a 5 book series, I expected this one to be THE book to move the story along… it didn’t even shuffle along, never mind move. Mac’s character went from 1.0 to 2.0 to 1.5; instead of growing she regressed, IMO; and I loved the way her character was coming along. Meh! I’ll finish this series. I want to see how KMM’s going to finish this story, but I’m waiting for the last book to come out and then I’ll read the last 2 installments.

  12. 2008 September 25

    LOL :blushes: possibly because I made it up.

    Ermmm and if I didn’t it was only because it seemed to be the perfect description for what happens in a lot of UF. I’ll go and check that I’ve tagged the posts (Sleeping Beauty) to make it easy for you to find them.

  13. 2008 September 26
    kmont permalink

    Hils, I think I will too. It’s clearly not worth the wait for one book anymore. Well, hopefully things will really pick up in the next one, but in case it doesn’t, waiting for the last two to read them together makes sense, especially after Faefever.

    Lesley, lol, good for you! It’s OK to make up your own theories – I do believe that how they get started. :D I will check it out today.

  14. 2008 September 26
    macbean permalink

    Wow. I just finished the 3rd book, and I must say, fine job! The ending needed to be done that way. I have a good feeling about where it will be that she starts the next. I hope that the majority of you out there that have read her Fever books have also read her Highlander books. If you have not, they are also connected to the Fever books.

    A+! Bravo! Karen Marie Moning is one of my greatest choices for reading. Can’t wait for the next Fever!!

  15. 2008 September 26
    kmont permalink

    Glad you liked the book, macbean! I think it’s wonderful when books DO work for others – it’s great to see continued proof that we’re all different – and that it’s OK not to like the same books. Despite my not caring much for this particular one, I too am looking forward to the others.

  16. 2008 September 29
    kmont permalink

    I hadn’t Bev, thanks for letting me know. I saw a review on Amazon that said pretty much the same thing, that Moning was condoning rape – I didn’t get that impression at all and am baffled that some could jump to that conclusion simply because rape is in Faeever. Well, not simply, I think the logic with some is that the rape is portrayed in such a way that Mac was enjoying what happened to her, because of the addictive quality to the princes’ sex.

    Still, I don’t blame Moning for addressing it. She’s been under fire about this series since it first released and I’ve read other comments by her where it’s clear it’s become irritating to her.

  17. 2008 September 30

    At first, your review made me want to actually read this series, even though I recently tried my first Moning — Beyond the Highland Mist, and didn’t really like it. At least it sounds like the first two books are worth it.

    We are having a long discussion about rape in romance over at my little blog, after I posted about it (not in reference to Moning, but in reference to Patricia Gaffney’s To Have and To Hold). I tried to explain when it might be morally wrong to use it. It does depend, as Moning says in the quote above, on character arcs and such.

    It sounds like in this case its use was gratuitous.

  18. 2008 September 30
    kmont permalink

    Jessica, I really don’t know yet, in the case with this book, if the use of rape is gratuitous or not. The rape literally happens within the last two or so pages of the book and leaves off there at that huge cliffhanger. This is the root of my frustrations with this installment, besides nothing much happening till the last 1/8 of the book or so. I am obviously not one of Moning’s instantly adoring fans that nod yes to whatever she’ll write ( I learned my lesson the hard way with WARD and some of her street possy) – despite the fact that I have loved most of her work. But leaving the book at that pivotal moment, yes, some people are going to question the WTFage of that scene. Plus, and I know this is dark fantasy, but I am so tired of seeing heroines brutalized in books for the sake of the plot. How about a woman that perseveres in spite of all the nasty things her enemies want to do to her, to put her in her place? Now THAT would be refreshing in this day and age. Folks want something different? How about them apples – a heroine that goes through some rough spots, but manages to NOT get raped, beaten, assaulted, what have you by some asshole male.

    It kind of makes me queasy to say it, but Moning supposedly has a “good reason” for Mac to be raped – it had to happen in the story according to Moning. Really? Rape HAS to happen? Given that that is where it ends, and it HAS TO HAPPEN – yeah, I question the HELL out of that.

    Sorry, lol, this is obviously a hot ticket with me. I’ll check out your blog and thanks for the heads up.

  19. 2008 September 30

    Now, here’s a perfect example of viewing the same scene from different POVs, based on our previous reading experiences.

    ” Folks want something different? How about them apples – a heroine that goes through some rough spots, but manages to NOT get raped, beaten, assaulted, what have you by some asshole male.”

    Whereas I see it just the opposite. In most books, there’s no sense of peril. To me it’s completely predictable that the heroine will either save herself and others or be saved by a convenient event or person.

    So for me, the scene WAS that something different that I look for. However, KMM could blow all my kudos away if she doesn’t handle the after-effects correctly. She cannot have Mac just shrug it off and move on.

  20. 2008 September 30
    kmont permalink

    Bev, I just want to take a moment to thank you. I know you liked FF, perhaps more than I did, so thanks for discussing it in a manner that’s not OMG how could you not like Faefever?!?!?!

    And as for “different”, yeah, a rape scene, or even a near rape scene, is not anything new in my reading experience. I suppose it’s all in what you look for when picking up a book (and lord knows that can change with every book I do pick up and read) I’m trying hard to hold off judgment on the whole rape thing till I can see it’s outcome in Dreamfever.

    I really, really doubt though that this will be shrugged of in any manner. But if it is, yeah….well, we all probably can figure what my reaction would be lol!

    I’m really glad you liked the book though and are comfortable with where it ended – I’d give anything sometimes to feel that way, but we just feel the way we do, ya know?

  21. 2008 October 1

    “thanks for discussing it in a manner that’s not OMG how could you not like Faefever?!?!?”

    If anyone EVER catches me making a statement like that, unless I’m clearly joking around, they need to slap me upside the head with a mackeral!

    Nope, the way I see it is that appeal of book discussions is to share and understand other POVs. At their very best, these discussions lead to me looking at a scene, character, etc. in a different way. But I don’t think the purpose of a book discussion is to try and change someone’s mind. That’s what leads to arguments and those are just not enjoyable to me.

    Heh, can you tell I used to spend time on the LKH board? One quickly learns over there what book discussions should NOT be!

  22. 2008 October 3
    kmont permalink

    Bev, I’ve been meaning to reply to this, because you made me LMAO with the mackerel comment! :D

    **But I don’t think the purpose of a book discussion is to try and change someone’s mind. That’s what leads to arguments and those are just not enjoyable to me.**

    Exactly! I think that is def what is happening sometimes. Discussion does not equal a my way or the highway mentality.

  23. 2008 November 10
    KatV permalink

    The rape scene in Faefever, while it bothered me for personal reasons, is not one that I greatly object to. Having read many, many romances where the heroine nearly meets with a bad end only to be rescued just in time does annoy me. I guess I echo Bev’s thoughts in that aspect. Bad things happen, and to good people. Not everyone is rescued in time. And a traumatic event like this does shape character- it can make someone stronger just as it can make them “weaker”. I personally loved the book, and am waiting for the next one (with very little patience, I might add).

  24. 2009 January 5
    ATalb permalink

    I would have to agree with BevQB. With all that went on in the three books it’s something that had to be written. Mac is already in a dangerous situation where she could loose her life and get sucked dry or whatever, so KMM felt that ending the third book like this was the big peril that Mac would have to overcome. Who is to say that Mac will get raped though? It might appear that way in the end but it might not actually happen. If it does Mac’s character is strong enough to overcome it and become stronger. She is already at this point less superficial. Mac’s character has more growing to do and this is part of it.

    I see it from your point of view as well, but you have to give it a chance. Why read three books to just give up and not find out how it all ends? It could turn out to surprise you. We’ll just have hope for the best! : )

    • 2009 January 5
      kmont permalink

      ATalb, the possibilities you talk about are certainly possible – some of which if they did occur I would not appreciate having my mind messed with, but I have stated that I’m going to keep reading the series. I’m simply waiting now till the last two books are both in print to do so. The problem with an ending like Faefever is that yes, we don’t know and can’t be exactly sure of what happened to Mac – cliffhanger. Some cliffhangers are OK, they don’t make one scream for the next book necessarily. Others, like Faefever’s, do. Various reasons on any one reader’s part, I’m sure.

      This book has been in the back of my mind ever since I read it – because of its ending, it’s not really possible to fully judge it or its place in the series yet. However, because of what Moning chose to write it’s made me wary. Can’t help it. And I think it’s weird at this point to smile and say it’s all going to be OK, but that is a strictly personal feeling. If it works for others, that’s great for them.

      I’ve already stated why this book didn’t work for me and looking back over it, it hasn’t changed. You make good points though, and I’m willing to see it all through to the end, but the end has to be published now before I’ll look.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS